American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Atlas of Science Literacy, Volumes 1 and 2. Washington, DC: Author.

Austin Independent School District. (2009). Creative thinking strand teaching overview. Retrieved on October 16, 2011 from

Buena Vista Pictures. (1989). Honey, I shrunk the kids [Motion picture].

Center for Gifted Education. (1997). Guide to teaching a problem-based science curriculum. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishers.

Center for Gifted Education. (2004). A guide to key science concepts. Williamburg, VA: Author.

Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46, 121-152.

Jones, M. G., Falvo, M. R., Taylor, A. R., & Broadwell, B. P. (2007). Nanoscale science: Activities for grades 6-12. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Jones, M. G., & Taylor, A. R. (2009). Developing a sense of scale: Looking backward. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 460-475. doi: 10.1002/tea.20288

Kitchner, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. Human Development, 26, 222-232. doi:10.1159/000272885

KQED. (2007). Nanotechnology takes off [Video].

Merriam-Webster. (2011). Learner's dictionary [website].

National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices,crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington,DC: The National Academies Press.

Puccio, G., Murdock, M. & Mance, M. (2007). Creative leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

SRI International. (2007). Nanosense: The basic sense behind nanoscience [website]. Retrieved on October 1, 2011 from

Starko, A. J. (2005). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Stevens, S. Y., Sutherland, L. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science & engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

The National Science Digital Library. (2011). NSDL science literacy maps [website]. Retrieved on October 1, 2011 from

Tieso, C. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roeper Review, 26, 29-36. doi:10.1080/02783190309554236

Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students’ and experts' concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 282-319. doi:10.1002/tea.20123

VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(4), 200-211. doi:10.1177/001698629804200404

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Website by Lori Andersen, 2012